2001 Buell Blast review from United States of America
"A fun and easy to ride bike"
What things have gone wrong with the motorcycle?
The standard rear Dunlop tire was completely worn by 3500 miles.
The bike tends to need refueling after only 2/3 of the tank has been used. I believe this is a known issue.
The HD-derived transmission is rather clunky.
General comments?
This is my first motorcycle and I have been very happy with it. It is easy to ride and handles incredibly well due to its light weight and low center of gravity. The brakes are fantastic.
The engine shakes a little (it's a 492 CC single), but has good power through the gears. The engine has been very reliable, doesn't use oil, and never fails to start, even in cold weather.
The transmission is geared well, but clunks from gear to gear, especially into first.
The styling is cool for a cheaper bike, and the HD dealer network is good. Parts can be surprisingly expensive, though.
Overall I'm very happy with the Blast and plan to upgrade to a different Buell in the future.
| Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model Year | 2001 |
| First year of ownership | 2003 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Acceleration marks | 7/10 |
| Roll-on Performance marks | 7/10 |
| Handling marks | 10/10 |
| Braking marks | 10/10 |
| Reliability marks | 8/10 |
| Comfort marks | 5/10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 7/10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10/10 |
| Distance when acquired | 1700 miles |
| Most recent distance | 4800 miles |
| Date of Entry | 15th February, 2005 |