2005 BMW R 1200 RT from United Kingdom - Comments

14th Apr 2006, 07:46

"Lovely bike with quality issues"

What things have gone wrong with the motorcycle?

Major fault with the gearbox - dangerously jumps out of gear regularly without warning. See below.

Lots of niggly faults;

Light units/indicators misted up.

Corrosion on various visible bolts.

Cruise control switch very stiff.

CD won't accept copies / skips over bumps on shop CDs.

Headlight needed adjusting downwards, which meant revisiting the dealer on the second day of ownership.

Tank panels have no guards like the R1100RT, and mark easily.

Stupid pannier box webbing, not elastics like on the R1100RT.

Box locks repaired under warranty - locked me out.

General comments?

For a big tourer, it is peerless and superb for long distances. Disappointing finish and quality control for BMW, and not as solid as the R1100/1150RT.

Compared to my previous model, the clocks on 1200 reflect in your face, tank knee guards are missing, boxes are inferior and have daft straps rather than elastics, the seat is not as comfortable, and it has a very different riding position.

Feels more Japanese than BMW - lighter, quicker, more agile, but poorer finish and corner cutting to save weight.

I spent 2005 on it, but had to sell it when I was nearly killed for the third time by the daft gearbox jumping out of gear mid bend, sending me into oncoming traffic again.

BMW checked everything, adjusted the gear pedal, nothing worked, ordered a new gearbox.

Other riders in my club are having the same issue with the 1200 'box, plus a Bike magazine staff rider is on the third 'box with the same issue.

Lovely bike, big problem.

Send comments for response...


10th Dec 2006, 21:18

I'm not sure what bike he was on. I have a 2006 RT and I have no issues with gearbox, fit or finish, and the cruise control is a dream.

Panniers are easy to use and easy to take off. I've been riding for over 40 years and this is absolutely the finest bike I've ever ridden and I've owned over two dozen bikes.

I'd say, you have a lemon. A very dangerous lemon. Send it back and ride another 1200 RT.

This is not the bike I know and I definitely wanted to make sure there are no lasting impressions or more accurately, false impressions of this bike. This is one, sweet bike!


6th Mar 2007, 12:22

I've owned an R 1200 RT since June 2006. I use it daily for commuting home to work. To date I have clocked 27 600 Km’s.

I had no problems with the gearbox, but did have the master cylinder replaced because it leaked causing the clutch to drag. The clutch was replaced as well. The leak caused sticky down gearing. This problem started after 6000 Km’s. The clutch started dragging again after 17 000 Km’s leading to the clutch being replaced again at 19 000 Km’s. Since then I have not experienced any more such problems.

The dealer did not have any hesitation in assisting me to correct the problems. The experience was a frustrating one, but not a show-stopper thanks to the service.

I have owned, and still do own other bikes. The RT is all that I could expect from such a bike and I certainly am very satisfied with the bike and the service I received.


31st Jul 2007, 10:44

I am the original writer of the report, and can genuinely say that the report I wrote was totally honest. I used the bike extensively in a variety of weathers, and was surprised by the lack of inherent quality compared to my earlier RT.

I had a number of problems as stated, which the dealer was efficient in dealing with, but should not have happened in the first place. Maybe this was due to mine being one of the very first made; and being used extensively in wet weather and stored uncovered outside (like my old, but better R1100RT).

I hope you are enjoying your bike!


29th Jun 2008, 16:18

**Update**

Original writer back again. I read the comments with interest, and would like to state again that my report was totally genuine. I gave the bike extensive all weather use and covered 12,000 mile in 6 months with the bike being left outside in a private parking space, not a garage.

I had loads of problems with it and had considerable warranty work carried out to it. The attention to detail on my (early) bike was poor and not what I had expected from BMW after my previous RT ownership experience. In fairness to BMW, they did replace the faulty parts and had ordered the new gearbox after acknowledging the fault.

I remember the R1200RT as being a very capable long distance tourer, but to this day am still disappointed with the rusting of various bolts, the electrical faults (whole left switchgear was replaced as cruise control faulty), the water in the lights and the dangerous gearbox to name what I can remember.

I genuinely feel that a number of items on the R1200RT were better on the 1100 and 1150 - eg the kneepads on the tank, the domed non-reflective clocks, the pannier elastic straps and the overall quality of plating and finish.

My '98 R1100RT had been halfway round the world and was still 100%, the 2005 R1200RT was tired by the end of 2005 at 12,000 miles, looked tatty in places and had needed a huge number of replacement parts including the ordered gearbox.

I liked the electronically adjustable suspension and far superior riding experience of the R1200RT though, but I expected better build and component quality from BMW. I now always buy the last of line of an outgoing old model, not the first of a new model-they are not "shaken down" enough and paying a premium to be the first on a new model is daft enough, to be part of the "product development" by being the test guinea pig is just crazy.

I am sure that any R1200 RT sold after 2007 was fully sorted after the early faults and warranty claims made BMW sort the bike.

Mine was well below par, and I stand by my comments. If you have an early bike with high wet weather mileage, watch out! I used mine extensively, unlike many Sunday riders.

Add another comment

Note: A Comments RSS Feed RSS Feed is available.

All BMW R 1200 RT reviews