1996 Triumph Adventurer review from United States of America
"Just do it!"
What things have gone wrong with the motorcycle?
The tachometer broke, but was replaced under the warranty.
The front fork seals have been replaced 3 times due to leaking.
General comments?
I really enjoy this motorcycle. After riding a 400 for 7 years, moving to a 900 was an amazing feeling. For a cruiser I feel this motorcycle handles incredibly well. I have been to several rallies, and always ride with the sport riders and have much fun while keeping up. It has a great power band from 3-8,000 that pulls all the way.
The stock seat is somewhat uncomfortable on long rides.
The small tank allows for a range of about 120 miles. Which is not nearly enough for the lonely roads out west.
Above 70mph the vibration in the handlebars is somewhat annoying on long rides.
I need a windscreen!
I get some kind of comment every place I take it. A real head turner with very distinctive looks and a beautiful Triumph badge that attracts much attention (this really angers my riding buddy on his BMW:) )
Recommended reviews
| This is a well balanced road cruiser |
|
| Looove it |
| Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? | Yes |
| Model year | 1996 |
| Year of manufacture | 1996 |
| First year of ownership | 1997 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2005 |
| Acceleration marks | 7 / 10 |
| Roll-on Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Handling marks | 7 / 10 |
| Braking marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Dealer Service marks | 8 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) | |
| Distance when acquired | 3000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 17000 miles |
| Previous motorcycle | Kawasaki KZ400 |
| Date of Entry | 26th August, 2005 |