Armstrong MT500 Review from United Kingdom

1982 Armstrong MT500

Year of manufacture1982
Acceleration marks 4 / 10
Roll-on Performance marks 4 / 10
Handling marks 3 / 10
Braking marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 3 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 5 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
4.6 / 10

Summary:

Grrrr!!! You're FIRED! But I like you, sort of

Faults:

Nothing.

General Comments:

Didn't have this machine long.

Why, because.. because.. because, I don't know why.

Reliable? Oh yes!

Stonking stonkability, stonking stonk! My son! Great bike, but what a pig to start! Little window down on the engine to see if a little something was in the right position. If not kick around until it was. Then apply some magic herbs and an incantation and boot the kick start.. Voila! Nothing! Wrong magic spell... cast another VVVrrrommm thud thud thud. Bomb proof! Start proof too sometimes.

What a horrid little warthog. An ex army bike with a bad attitude problem. It didn't obey orders, namely 'START!' Armstrong, you're fired! Great ped though! Unless you own one and have friends, no pillion pegs! Boo hoo! PIG!

Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 14th June, 2008

Average review marks: 4.6 / 10, based on 1 review