Kawasaki GT 550 Reviews from United Kingdom

1996 Kawasaki GT 550

Model year1996
Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2011
Most recent year of ownership2012
Acceleration marks 7 / 10
Roll-on Performance marks 7 / 10
Handling marks 8 / 10
Braking marks 8 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.6 / 10
Distance when acquired24000 miles
Most recent distance39000 miles
Previous motorcycleKawasaki GT 550

Summary:

Totally dependable, good at everything, brilliant at nothing

Faults:

Nothing, except put a new battery in.

Very reliable; goes all day without problem. Had these bikes many years ago, and they will do 150,000 miles if you look after them well, or 100,000 miles if you do not look after so well.

Sound bikes; the couriers can't all be wrong.

General Comments:

Solid, reliable, dependable, and mine is G9. I think 59HP, so quite good performance for what it is.

I forgot; very comfortable bike for long distance.

Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 2nd August, 2012

1996 Kawasaki GT 550

Model year1996
Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2000
Most recent year of ownership2012
Acceleration marks 6 / 10
Roll-on Performance marks 6 / 10
Handling marks 6 / 10
Braking marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.9 / 10
Distance when acquired11000 miles
Most recent distance118000 miles
Previous motorcycleHarley-Davidson Sportster XL 1200C

Summary:

Bullet Proof!

Faults:

My clutch springs went at about 60,000 miles, causing the clutch to be very stiff, and made it difficult to change gear. The cable was also a little stretched. Replaced the springs with heavy duty EBC parts, and also replaced all the plates with EBC items while it was open; the old plates were still within spec though.

Standard exhaust rotted through within the first two years of owning the bike, because I ride all year round, so I'd say by 30,000 miles the system was replaced with a stainless Motad 4-1 that's still going strong.

General Comments:

Since owning the bike I've covered over 100,000 miles with virtually no problems, rebuilt the clutch and have changed the exhaust. I ride all year round and don't baby the beast. I don't thrash it through the gears, but all day cruising is 80/90mph with blasts up to 110mph when the urge hits me. I commute daily, and also use it for touring holidays and long weekends quite often, covering 1000 miles in three days.

The longest trip taken on her was two up through Europe, covering 8000 miles in three weeks; not a single problem!

This however is what I believe to be the secret to its long trouble free life so far; REGULAR preventative maintenance!

I change the oil and filter every 2000 miles religiously, and NEVER go more than 3000 miles without changing the oil. I use fully synthetic premium quality oil and good filters.

The diff oil gets changed at the same time.

New spark plugs every 10,000 miles along with cleaned after market air filter and balance the carbs. Balancing the carbs should not be skipped, they go out pretty quickly; 10,000 mile intervals I find to be just right for how I ride.

The valve shims get checked/adjusted every 20,000 miles.

Also I've made a habit of keeping her well cleaned, polished and lubricated. I use a lot of WD, and any rusty bits get rubbed down and Hammerited! For an old bike with high mileage, she looks fantastic. All those that say they rot quicker than you can say "Salty roads kill bikes", obviously never clean their bikes. The tail light bit on the rear guard is only showing signs of rust bubbles this year!

If looked after, I believe this bike will cover another 120,000 miles with nothing more than what it's received already.

Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 16th April, 2012

1992 Kawasaki GT 550

Year of manufacture1992
Acceleration marks 8 / 10
Roll-on Performance marks 8 / 10
Handling marks 8 / 10
Braking marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 10 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.8 / 10
Distance when acquired27000 miles
Most recent distance27460 miles
Previous motorcycleMoto Guzzi 750T

Summary:

As a purchase purely on aesthetics, an excellent choice!

Faults:

Bike was missing carbs.

Brakes seized (front).

Rear brake shaft seized.

General Comments:

I bought the bike as I liked the older styling.

Ideal bike for touring bike. Rock solid on the road, and very comfortable.

Fitting the carbs is a good way of measuring how your patience has decreased! But has improved my french language!!

Always fit new rubbers, can be done, but so much easier when replaced.

As someone else on here has already written, if you're not looking for back breaking performance or leaving the traffic behind to catch up at the next lights, but being able to walk when you reach your destination, or just having an enjoyable ride, this bike will do it all in relaxed comfort.

Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Don't Know

Review Date: 5th February, 2012

1990 Kawasaki GT 550

Model year1990
Year of manufacture1990
First year of ownership2009
Most recent year of ownership2009
Acceleration marks 7 / 10
Roll-on Performance marks 6 / 10
Handling marks 6 / 10
Braking marks 4 / 10
Reliability marks 9 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
6.7 / 10
Distance when acquired60000 miles
Most recent distance62000 miles
Previous motorcycleHonda ST1100 pan european

Summary:

Good cheap hack

Faults:

Back shocker bushes,

General Comments:

Pretty quick for what it is, I bought it as a do up hack and it's good fun. Cost me about £250 in total including the few parts I've had to buy to get it roadworthy.

Not for speed freaks, once you get near 100mph it gets scary, and you've no protection from the wind and rain.

Good on fuel, narrow for filtering in town yet powerful enough to overtake easily out on the A-roads.

Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 28th May, 2009

Average review marks: 7.4 / 10, based on 6 reviews