Kawasaki ZX-6R Reviews from United Kingdom

1996 Kawasaki ZX-6R

Year of manufacture1996
First year of ownership2003
Most recent year of ownership2007
Acceleration marks 9 / 10
Roll-on Performance marks 6 / 10
Handling marks 8 / 10
Braking marks 10 / 10
Reliability marks 10 / 10
Comfort marks 8 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 8 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
8.4 / 10
Distance when acquired14000 miles
Most recent distance30000 miles
Previous motorcycleYamaha XJ600

Summary:

Superb

Faults:

Front callipers needed new seals after 25,000 miles and being ridden through 8 British winters.

Swinging arm bearings and rear shock linkages also needed replacement after 25,000 miles and being ridden through 8 British winters, but I'm not complaining!

Downpipes are very rusty now, time for some stainless replacements.

A bit of carburettor icing in cold, damp conditions.

General Comments:

Absolutely superb. Seriously. It does 160 mph, it frightens the wotsits out of me around Brands Hatch, and yet on the road it returns 45 mpg and costs £120 fully comp for the insurance!

People moan in a lot of reviews that it can't 'hack' it against modern 600s. No, it can't. It is 10 years old now and was one of the quickest, if not the quickest in class when it was built, but it's a decade old, so it won't keep up with the 636.

Let's face it, most people ride their 600s on the road, this bike has good fuel economy, a fairing big enough to tuck behind. Solo up to 5 hours in the saddle is possible and the missus will sit on the back with a weekends' luggage for 2 hours at a time. It's got more mid-range than a similar vintage GSXR 600, and more top end and sports potential than the CBR. Oh, it has that Kawasaki trademark airbox yowl and sounds glorious on a noisy pipe.

Spares are cheap, so is the insurance, and you can pick up a fairly tidy one for £1000. I bought a complete set of bodywork and wheels for £350 which I use for trackdays and then swap for standard for riding to work.

If you can cope without having the latest sports bike, and want something to give you an ear to ear grin and your wallet an easy time, buy one of these. In green!

Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 7th October, 2007

28th Oct 2007, 02:40

Your report was spot on.

6th May 2008, 10:11

Excellent evaluation of a fantastic bike, would recommend one to anyone!

1999 Kawasaki ZX-6R

Model year1999
Year of manufacture1999
First year of ownership2001
Most recent year of ownership2003
Acceleration marks 9 / 10
Roll-on Performance marks 7 / 10
Handling marks 8 / 10
Braking marks 5 / 10
Reliability marks 8 / 10
Comfort marks 7 / 10
Dealer Service marks 6 / 10
Running Costs (higher is cheaper) 7 / 10
Overall marks (average of all marks)
7.1 / 10
Distance when acquired8021 miles
Most recent distance29900 miles
Previous motorcycleHonda VFR750

Summary:

If it's your first middleweight 600, it'll teach you a lot

Faults:

Persistent problems with warped feeling front discs when braking - front discs replaced three times free of charge, but problem never sorted.

Again front brakes. After the discs were replaced a couple of times the brake lever never felt as firm as it did when I first bought the bike, even after fitting braided hoses. Spent many hours bleeding and re-bleeding, but never got it back to normal.

Head bearings at 12000 and 21000 miles.

Rear wheel bearings at 26000 miles.

Unsurprisingly, rear shock pretty slack by 29000 miles!

General Comments:

The power is typical Kawasaki, a big rush towards the top end of the revs. It sounded great too, with it's ally Quill race can. I had to buy a green one, obviously, a top looking machine in my opinion!

Started out on Bridgestone 010's, which felt fantastic and the rear did about 3500 miles. I went to Metzeler Sportecs, which weren't quite up to the 010s' levels for feel. Eventually had to go for more touring type tyres cos of the mileage I was doing. Pirelli Dragon GTS, which lasted about 5000 miles on the back, but neither ends gave much feel.

But the thing was great to ride, very fast (wicked acceleration from about 7000 rpm and top speed of 172 indicated), stable and forgiving. I remember having one mother of a tankslapper when accelerating hard over cats eyes, which by rights should have either had me on the floor or bouncing into the car I was overtaking (must have scared the crap out of them; proper lock-to-lock job). But it kept me upright, which I was very grateful for.

I went up two teeth at the back sprocket in an attempt to get some of the rampant feel of my mates '99 R6. It didn't make a lot of differnce at higher speeds but it did come up on the back wheel a lot more often then, in first and sometimes second.

The only really gutting thing was the trouble I had with the brakes. It still hurts when I think back to all the trouble I had, but the front end was not right from the start. When braking down from a good speed, it always felt like a warped or badly fitted brake disc. To be fair Frasers of Gloucester replaced the discs three times to try and sort it (mind you the last time was because the previous set were 2mm undersize - make of that what you will), and the front wheel was balanced. The problem was never sorted.

Also the front brakes went soft at the lever, and I spent HOURS over the course of a year bleeding over and over again trying to sort that out, ending up with braided hoses and spending a lot more time trying to bleed those. Still never fixed it. That was the only thing that let this bike down. I remember that the brakes were amazing when I first got the bike, but it wasn't long before that feeling was a distant memory.

In the end I couldn't face riding the poor thing through a third winter and so sold it to get myself four wheels and a big stereo...

The build quality is not fantastic, and it will suffer if you take the thing through a couple of winters. Keep up on the servicing and preventative maintenance and it shouldn't let you down.

I did love my time with it and compared to the VFR; what it lacked in torque, it made up with in attitude and handling.

Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 3rd January, 2007

8th Feb 2008, 14:56

Hi there. Your braking woes I have seen and cured before. It seems as though your front wheel is not centred correctly. This in itself causes two main problems; a slight drag on the brake pads and a tendency to warp its discs, and secondly the master cylinder has to travel further in its bore to displace the pistons, pushing against the preload or side sheer of the discs.

In short, ensure the front spindle and caliper pistons are fully centralised by adjusting the fork end pinch nut to the right position, tighten spindle in recheck centralisation. This should restore a solid feel to the lever, as you're not distorting the disc before pad contact.

Average review marks: 7.8 / 10, based on 2 reviews