| Model year | 1992 |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 2012 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2012 |
| Acceleration marks | 10 / 10 |
| Roll-on Performance marks | 7 / 10 |
| Handling marks | 9 / 10 |
| Braking marks | 7 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 8 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 10 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) |
8.7 / 10
|
| Distance when acquired | 24000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 34000 miles |
| Previous motorcycle | Harley-Davidson Sportster XL 1200C |
Summary:
Very reliable, great MPG, a blast to ride
Faults:
No problems so far.
General Comments:
Fast, a whole lot of fun to ride, comfortable, and handles curves like a dream. More fun to ride than most sport bikes I have ridden in the past. I LOVE THIS BIKE!!
Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 30th March, 2012
| Model year | 1992 |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 2012 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2012 |
| Acceleration marks | 7 / 10 |
| Roll-on Performance marks | 6 / 10 |
| Handling marks | 7 / 10 |
| Braking marks | 9 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 9 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 7 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 9 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) |
7.7 / 10
|
| Distance when acquired | 12000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 13500 miles |
Summary:
I really enjoy my 92 Nighthawk
Faults:
Flat rear tire due to puncture.
General Comments:
I enjoy how light the Nighthawk is. This adds to the performance of the motorcycle, and the way it turns.
I like the size of the 750 engine. Good on gas, and it has enough power to be fun too.
Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 17th March, 2012
| Model year | 1992 |
| Year of manufacture | 1992 |
| First year of ownership | 2010 |
| Most recent year of ownership | 2010 |
| Acceleration marks | 7 / 10 |
| Roll-on Performance marks | 9 / 10 |
| Handling marks | 7 / 10 |
| Braking marks | 6 / 10 |
| Reliability marks | 10 / 10 |
| Comfort marks | 9 / 10 |
| Running Costs (higher is cheaper) | 8 / 10 |
| Overall marks (average of all marks) |
8.0 / 10
|
| Distance when acquired | 26000 miles |
| Most recent distance | 28000 miles |
| Previous motorcycle | Honda Aero 50 |
Summary:
Reliable, comfortable, sporty motorcycle. I love it!
Faults:
When I bought the bike, I knew it would need new tires. Got a Dunlop front on sale for $45 and the rear for $120, 30 a side to install, pretty reasonable for tires.
Speedometer and odometer quit because front wheel bearing went bad and shredded the plastic gear; $25 part with $30 more labor to replace.
Missing one reflector and chrome swingarm bolt covers (extremely minor and hard to notice these things).
General Comments:
This is a great motorcycle, very comfortable and easy to ride, but with plenty of power for just about any situation. The engine is very tractable and hard to stall and has nice progressive clutch feel. If you should end up in the wrong gear for the situation, it usually doesn't matter because the engine is so torquey. The transmission is also easy to find each gear and neutral with, if a bit clunky overall.
It's also an extremely reliable bike; it starts perfectly every time, even when sitting out overnight in the near freezing temperatures. The materials used are all extremely high quality and easy to care for, making for a bike that's 18 years old, but looks and rides like a 2 year old.
At nearly 500lbs with a full tank, it's not the lightest bike in the world, but very easy to balance at low speeds and roomy enough for a 6' rider like me to fit comfortably. It also handles better than you'd expect from its specifications, and will let you have some fun in the twisties. The previous owner added a Spitfire windshield and custom highway pegs, which also make it nice for long trips too.
The only real quibbles I have with it are general stock/naked bike concerns. The suspension is pretty soft and not the most responsive, though comfortable for cruising. The stock seat could also have a little more padding, but it's not a crotch mangler or anything like that. Finally, it would probably handle better with a fatter set of tires, the stock ones are fairly narrow, but the low cost of replacing the stockers is pretty nice. Even with the windshield the wind does make it's presence known at higher speeds, just hang on tighter and remember how much it costs to replace plastics!
Overall, I don't think you could really go wrong with a Nighthawk 750. I picked mine up for $2000, and it's been a complete joy and very adaptable to many situations.
Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes
Review Date: 14th June, 2010
Bike is still running great. Managed to foul the spark plugs once after running hard and fast, and then having to idle for like 4-5 minutes at a light. The plugs were super old though, and after replacing them, the bike ran perfectly, even better than before. That said, even with fouled plugs, it still got me 10+ miles home to fix it. The plugs were only $2.50 each too, so pretty reasonable cost and easy to change.
OP again. Now over 50k miles on the same bike. Still no problems, have replaced the air filter with a reusable UNI, and the chain and sprockets. Finally replaced the Dunlop front that I got 20k miles out of and rear with radials (were bias plys), and the handling and stopping have been transformed, much better stability and especially low speed grip. So far (2k miles) they show no wear, so anticipating a long life.
The engine still purrs, but I will replace the valve cover gasket soon as it lets out just a touch of oil vapors at the corners. No appreciable oil use, but replacing it will be a snap anyway, so why not? Using it everyday (barring rain) for a 50 mile round trip commute at highway speeds frequently above 75mph, then followed by moderately twisty roads. The bike handles the mix perfectly, and being nice and warmed up (tires & engine) for the twisties, it always brings a smile before I arrive at work.