1998 Yamaha YZF1000R Thunderace

Summary:

A great bike, not to be underestimated

Faults:

Nothing.

General Comments:

Bought the motorcycle in 2001 as an upgrade from my old bike. The looks impressed me and the general opinion from owners made me decide this was the bike or me.

No disappointments here, from the word go I can only describe this bike as the best ride I have had, with as much speed as you like with blistering take off. Cornering and roundabouts are not as good as later sports bikes, but all else more than makes up for this.

Good comfortable riding position, fantastic midrange and stopping power, gives you the confidence to get on the gas through the gears.

Reliability seems to be faultless, no problems whatsoever in all the years I have owned this bike, more sports than tourer, a real gem that's staying with me.

Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 8th January, 2006

2nd Nov 2006, 08:45

In portugal we love fast bikes, but I made a bad call, the ace uses too much oil. Mine has 21000km and to go 1000km it USES 500ml.

1997 Yamaha YZF1000R Thunderace

Summary:

Will NEVER be without one, even if I buy a different make and model etc

Faults:

Zero faults.

General Comments:

By today's standards, this motorcycle is an old and heavy item. It never really was a popular bike with the bike journalists, always pulling it down, never showing it in the magazines.

Both the front and rear suspension can be adjusted by 3 ways - compound, rebound and damping, and when this is set up to suit the rider, it is an amazing piece of kit. In a rare article by Performance Bikes, they set up a Thunderace and were overtaking R1's on the outside of corners.

The engine is bullet proof, only needing oil and filter changes at specified intervals, spark plugs every blue moon, and valve clearances every other blue moon.

Once aboard and riding the Thunderace, it is remarkably nimble. I am 6 feet and 3 inches and even with the wife on the back, it is still easy to maneuver through town.

The national speed limit can easily be broken in first gear, and I am talking about the motorway speed limit here. 2nd will bring 100mph, 3rd brings 120 mph etc. There may be other newer bikes that easily beat that, but remember these bikes started out way back in 1996, 10 years ago, just imagine what bikes will do in the next 10 years compared to the so called dogs B's now.

Passengers are sat quite comfortably and are not perched on your shoulder like a parrot compared to other bikes.

Would you buy another motorcycle from this manufacturer? Yes

Review Date: 6th December, 2005

9th Aug 2006, 23:33

I agree man, I've owned a 97 since new. It has 81000KM and it runs very good, but it's always using some oil. Even so, I wouldn't change it for an R1. I drove 99 and 03 R1s, and I think the Thunderace is a better bike than the R1 from 98 to 03, not to mention that is way more stable at high speeds and more comfortable. I occasionally do 1000KM trips in one day.

Yarek from Ontario, Canada.